<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Copyright Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description>The Rule of Law: Protecting the Many from the Few</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intellectual Property and Copyright infringement</title>
		<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Intellectual Property and Copyright infringement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] Intellectual Property and Copyright infringement     This is a VERY interesting video regarding copyright infringement and Open Source software. I found it linked on one of the .Edu sites I found for my subscribers.  http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intellectual Property and Copyright infringement     This is a VERY interesting video regarding copyright infringement and Open Source software. I found it linked on one of the .Edu sites I found for my subscribers.  <a href="http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/" rel="nofollow">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Commons in Romania</title>
		<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Commons in Romania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] romanesc, precedentele nu sunt &#8220;lege&#8221;, asa cum se intampla in America. Cu toate astea exista un caz in USA in care un poducator de software care a publicat un soft sub licenta Open Source castigat un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] romanesc, precedentele nu sunt &#8220;lege&#8221;, asa cum se intampla in America. Cu toate astea exista un caz in USA in care un poducator de software care a publicat un soft sub licenta Open Source castigat un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Pfaffenberger</title>
		<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Pfaffenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Very nice job on this. Clear and right on the point. I would only add that there are limits to what copyright holders should specify in their licenses. For example, a company that created a database of labor relations materials specified in their license that members of labor unions could not access the database. 

In accordance with democratic ideals, valid contractual limits on the use of copyrighted material should be limited to those rights which the copyright holder possesses, namely, the right to copy, distribute, modify, or perform the work. Open sources licenses fall well within this limitation. They say, in essence, that you may only copy or modify this work if you extend the same privileges to the recipients of your copies or modifications.

B. Pfaffenberger, Univ. of Virginia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice job on this. Clear and right on the point. I would only add that there are limits to what copyright holders should specify in their licenses. For example, a company that created a database of labor relations materials specified in their license that members of labor unions could not access the database. </p>
<p>In accordance with democratic ideals, valid contractual limits on the use of copyrighted material should be limited to those rights which the copyright holder possesses, namely, the right to copy, distribute, modify, or perform the work. Open sources licenses fall well within this limitation. They say, in essence, that you may only copy or modify this work if you extend the same privileges to the recipients of your copies or modifications.</p>
<p>B. Pfaffenberger, Univ. of Virginia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Scott</title>
		<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/17/open-source-copyright-infringement/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Here’s a link to comments by an Australian lawyer on the case:
http://brendanscott.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/jacobsen-v-katzer-a-view-of-the-antipodes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a link to comments by an Australian lawyer on the case:<br />
<a href="http://brendanscott.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/jacobsen-v-katzer-a-view-of-the-antipodes/" rel="nofollow">http://brendanscott.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/jacobsen-v-katzer-a-view-of-the-antipodes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

