<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPS &amp; the Fourth Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/14/gps-the-fourth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/14/gps-the-fourth-amendment/</link>
	<description>The Rule of Law: Protecting the Many from the Few</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilM</title>
		<link>http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/14/gps-the-fourth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jurisvodcast.com/2008/08/14/gps-the-fourth-amendment/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Based on the WaPO story:

As long as the subject is already in the system and subject to parole monitoring or some type of restrictive court order, I see no problem in doing this. The slippery slope comes into play when the cops indulge in fishing expeditions.

As we all know, computer records never disappear, especially those kept by the government. I think a warrant should be required for this level of intrusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the WaPO story:</p>
<p>As long as the subject is already in the system and subject to parole monitoring or some type of restrictive court order, I see no problem in doing this. The slippery slope comes into play when the cops indulge in fishing expeditions.</p>
<p>As we all know, computer records never disappear, especially those kept by the government. I think a warrant should be required for this level of intrusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
