Skip to content

CA Supremes Kill Non-Compete Clause

Labor won a victory in the California case of Edwards v. Arthur Anderson.

 
icon for podpress  Podcast Video: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Edwards was an accountant for Arthur Anderson. The company folded its US operations due to the disgrace of Enron.  Edwards wanted a job.  The company wanted him to sign away any claims he might have with the company in return for being released from the non-compete clause.  The CA Supreme Court agreed with the employee and struck down the offending clause.

Most states interpret non-compete clauses narrowly, given the immense bargaining power of corporations and the importance of a worker’s freedom to ply his or her trade.  Read the Edwards v. Anderson opinion for yourself. While you’re at it, read DCS v. Castillo , a 2006 case from the 8th Circuit.  That case interprets Nebraska law. The employee won this case, too.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*